It’s not her job to have her intimate medical information exploited to publicise these health problems. Menopause and alcoholism are both private medical information. Nicola did not consent to having her medical information shared. But it is a breakdown of trust between public and police that got us hereĭisagree. The carnival of hysteria over Nicola Bulley shows us the very worst of modern human nature Zoe Williamsīulley’s family faced a cruel sleuthing free-for-all on social media. Its just my opinion, but I think a lot of employers have preferred not to address the struggles that some of their employees have with the menopause, because they perceive some sort of loss of labour, sick days, whatever. I think any woman out there who is struggling with this sort of thing, should be able to openly discuss with her employer, her partner, her children, and not be judged, because stuff happens, to all of us, and sometimes we need to feel we can share it, and that we're not alone. I think the information released about NB added potential context/backdrop to the situation, which may or may not have been useful overall, but it didn't paint NB as anything other than a loving mother, partner, daughter, worker, whatever. Its nobodies fault, and those who do struggle, need support from their partners, their employers, the health services and other people who have also suffered from similar symptoms. Its a health issue, same as addiction, and it needs to be framed as such.
I don't believe many people are judgemental or misogynistic towards NB, given what was said. Everything the police left unsaid opened a vacuum, into which armchair detectives and keyboard warriors piled with conspiracies, speculation and fantasy. Everything the police said with confidence led to a riot of speculation about all the other things they may not have considered. In the Bulley case, the opposite happened. We would have had the social maturity to understand that, and curiosity would have been muted by empathy. They would be mindful of the feelings of the family, and that would engender its own restraint and discretion. If they did suspect a third party, they might not want to release details or theories that they could use later to establish culpability or force a confession. If the police suspected no third party involvement, they still wouldn’t necessarily stick to a single hypothesis, still less announce it. Until relatively recently, everyone would have understood that during an active missing person investigation, official details would be scant, perhaps even deliberately misleading. But it is a breakdown of trust between public and police that got us hereįor Lancashire constabulary, however, being proven right will inspire no retrospective confidence in them – this entire sad period has spoken of a complete breakdown in trust between the public and the authorities, in this case the police.
Britannica Beyond We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning.
#MUD RIVER DOG HOW TO#
0 kommentar(er)
